Here We Go Again. This Time It's Citigroup

The last time I blogged about bonuses it was in defense of those being paid to the employees and managers of American International Group, AIG. Now Citigroup, which is a holding company as well, is now going to ask Big Daddy if they can pay out bonuses to keep some key personnel. Big Daddy owns a 36% stake in Citigroup. So he can decide if Citigroup can pay any additional money out to key people.

Get ready for some hand wrangling and teeth gnashing from congress and the white house on this. The problem is that Citigroup needs to keep its key people in its energy-trading unit, Phibro, to continue to go forward and emerge from their current fiscal problems. The employees in this unit are threatening to leave because of the paycaps that were instituted under the bailout rules. Phibro has contributed hundreds of millions of dollars in profits to the bank.

The CEO of Citi, Vikram Pandit, should have sounded the alarm early on and not sat idly by while he was forced to agree to the government terms of operations to accept bailout funding. He was not alone in this. All of the chief executives of the banks should have been more vocal in their demands. But I guess beggars can't be choosers! All the banks knew that they would have a brain drain of their key people if they could not pay them market rates and bonuses. Now Pandit wants to provide stock-based bonuses for these people to keep them from jumping ship. This stock will vest over three years. Well, I say good luck to that. With your stock price hovering around $3 per share and losing over 95% of its value since 2007 I would rather you pay me with Mega Millions Lottery game tickets.

Citigroup has been operating like germs in a petri dish. Under the microscope and constant observation. These bonuses are needed to raise the morale of a group that are being demoralized by working for the government. When you work for the government you are told that you will toil all day and all night for pittance. You will like it and you will not ask for more because you have a job, be thankful. But for the employees that must work under these conditions if you see the light, go into it. Leave on your terms. Do not bank on the idea that Citigroup can change the mind of the Treasury Department or the President.

The government should help but Obama is a man of polling approval. The vast populace of the country often does not understand bonuses and how they are achieved or paid. They have wealth envy and think that these guys make enough already. The polls will say that Americans are opposed to paying any bonuses and Obama will force Geithner to tell Citigroup, No go!

Bonuses are always a good thing when paid for the right reasons. Have key levers attached and measurements to show that they were achieved and the company does what it is suppose to do and that is pay them when they are achieved. Our banks are becoming Nationalized and the brain drain will continue. The best and the brightest will go work somewhere else but not for these U.S. Banks.

Those are my Words! Please post Yours!

More Due Diligence...AIG Bonuses

Even a dog knows better than to bite the hand that feeds him. But I guess that does not apply to congressional leaders that received donations in 2008 from their arch-enemy, the "greedy American International Group- AIG."

Heading the list was none other than the Senate Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd and then Senator and presidential campaigner Barack Obama. But then this is Washington politics. Here is a short list of some of the recipients of AIG political contributions:

1. Chris Dodd $103,100
2. Barack Obama $101,332
3. John McCain $59,499
4. Hillary Clinton $35,965
5. Max Baucus $24,750
6. Mitt Romney* $20,850
7. Joe Biden $19,975
8. John Larson $19,750
9. Rudy Giuliani* $13,200
10. Dick Durbin $11,000
    

*presidential campaign contribution

During this 2008 cycle 55 House members and 33 Senators received these payouts. I don't hear any of them rushing to give the donations back. Democrats were the chief recipients with $442,996 while Republicans received $142,792. So where is the American public outrage. I'll wait....

The "Blame Somebody" Obama Administration claims that Senator Dodd included in the $787B stimulus bill an amendment that provided exemption for contractually obligated bonuses agreed on or before February 11, 2009 which exempted these AIG bonuses paid this week. Dodd has denied inserting the "Dodd Amendment". He claims that he did not include those dates and that when the legislation left the Senate it did not contain that language but when it returned those dates were inserted. Fine Mr. Dodd but congressional record shows that you still voted in favor of the bill. If you were so outraged by the amendment then why the yea vote? I'll wait....

Now Dodd seeks to tax the bonus recipients so that the government can recoup some of the $165M that AIG is paying out. So the politicians seek to specifically craft a bill to only tax AIG managers and executives that received these bonus payouts. This is ludicrous since the bill would only be targeted at a handfull of individuals! So you know that the actual language of the bill will target all bonuses paid to managers and executives of any company in the United States. And if any of you have ever received a management bonus then you would know that it has almost 40% Federal withholding taken out prior to you getting your money. Yet these same congress members and president signed a omnibus spending bill that had over $8 billion of earmarks ala pork and that's o.k.? On a percentage basis this is more than the 1/10th of 1% that the AIG bonuses represent.

What is not being told is that some of these financial service executives agreed to take $1 salaries for 2009 in exchange for receiving their retention bonuses. These were deals that were struck with "Turbo Tax" Timothy Geithner when he was the head of the New York Federal Reserve and arranging for the AIG bailout. So he knew that they were in there. These retention payments range from $1,000 to $6.5 Million. So the worker getting $1,000 would be ostracized by American society for receiving such a pittance of a bonus.

America please wake up before it is too late. I'll wait....

That's my word! Please post yours!

Doing Due Diligence and AIG

When buying a company you should always conduct your due diligence in examining how that company operates, is financed and what ongoing contracts or obligations it has. In other words you ask for their financial books and you begin your due diligence discovery. On May 1, 2008, Delta Airlines and Northwest Airlines agreed to create the world's largest airline through a merger of the two companies. At some point prior to this announcement they both had to open their books for financial review to see if this potential marriage would work.

Along comes our Federal Government with its gotta get something done now mentality and buys $170 billion of American International Group, Inc. better known as AIG. Former Treasury Secretary, Hank Paulson, called the Wall Street company to Washington D.C. to iron out a proposed bailout of AIG which had gotten into deep money troubles with the collapse of our financial industry. What Paulson and the rest of the Washington knuckleheads did not do was ask all of the banks that were being bailed out to allow the government to examine their financial books thoroughly. $170 billion dollars later everyone is an uproar about $165 million in bonuses being paid out by AIG. In other words all of these intellectual dimwits did not do their due diligence for the American taxpayer. You and I spend more time reading our escape clause in our cell phone contracts than what was done here.

If this had occured just maybe someone would have seen the contracts for these bonuses. Because we are a country based upon the rule of law there is nothing anyone from Barney Franks, to Chris Dodd, to Nancy Pelosi or even Barack Obama can do. These bonuses are contractual and were already in place prior to the sky falling in for AIG. One way that these bonuses could have been eliminated is to have allowed AIG to go into a controlled bankruptcy and then the people who were slated to be paid bonuses for 2008 would have to get in line with the rest of the creditors as AIG tried to emerge from bankruptcy. Another way would have been to ask that the bonuses be deferred as long as the company was in trouble and owed the taxpayers.

Now that everyone on Capitol Hill is ranting about the timing of these payouts; they should look in the mirror. They are responsible for this not AIG. Had they taken the necessary time instead of rushing to the rescue there would have been better opportunity to review all of the operations of AIG and others. Paulson also set up the bailout so that these companies did not have to report how they planned to spend the monies lent to them. No court in this land will override the decision of AIG to pay these bonuses. Contracts are binding unless there was fraud by one party and since the recipients are getting what they expected and AIG indicates these bonuses are due then who was defrauded? Not the Federal Government. They never did their due diligence.

AIG is a holding company for many different companies. AIG has businesses in general insurance, financial services, asset management and life insurance & retirement services. And because we do not know who exactly will receive these bonuses and how each of the many companies under the AIG umbrella performed; it is not prudent to assume that someone is not deserving of their bonus. Nor do we know how each of the many companies performed individually. Some divisions of this organization may have been performing well above expectations and that is what helped trigger their contractual bonus payout. If it turns out that AIG is just paying bonuses to pay bonuses without the necessary performance triggers then shame on them and they deserve the intense scrutiny they are receiving. But our government set it up that they did not have to report as to how they are spending your money. Due Diligence not done! Necessary precautions not taken! No common or business sense. Government at its very best! You see what happens when Congress does things in haste. The good thing is that Obama and his team did not set these arrangements up but he did vote yes to the $750 billion bailout as Senator and Presidential candidate.

I am not opposed to anyone at AIG or any other bailout company receiving bonus payouts that were agreed to as long as the terms of the performance were met. Mr. Obama issued more of his rhetoric today, that Treasury Secretary, Timothy Geithner would be using any legal means necessary to stop or reverse these payments. This is the same Mr. Geithner that has yet to produce the plan for shoring up our financial and banking industry. The same Treasury Department that has yet to get a Deputy Treasury Secretary to assist Mr. Geithner. When is he going to have the time for this assignment? I'll wait......

That's my word! Please post yours!